Keywords
Station rotation model
Turkish as a foreign language
Online instruction
Collaborative learning
How to Cite
Abstract
This study aims to explore Kazakh students’ perspectives on the Station Rotation Model (SRM), one of the blended learning models used in teaching Turkish as a foreign language. Learning stations, comprising online work, pair work, and group work, were structured to foster an interactive learning environment. The study employed a qualitative research design, with interview data analysed through qualitative coding supported by descriptive quantitative techniques. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with Kazakh students (n = 13) to gather feedback on the implementation of SRM. The findings revealed that most students perceived SRM positively and appreciated the model’s innovative approach and the opportunities it provided for active engagement. However, several challenges were identified, such as including unequal participation in group activities, difficulties in listening comprehension, and technology-related issues. The study emphasizes that effective implementation of SRM in language teaching requires careful planning, adequate teacher training, and appropriate instructional materials.
References
Aldukhi, A. (2020). The impact of using the station rotation model on Saudi EFL learners’ descriptive writing skills [Master’s thesis, Al-Imam Muhammad Ibn Saud Islamic University]. SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3826869
Ayob, N. S., Halim, N. D. A., Zulkifli, N. N., Zaid, N. M., & Mokhtar, M. (2020). Overview of blended learning: The effect of station rotation model on students’ achievement. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(6), 320–326. https://doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.06.56
Basuki, M., & Arianto, F. (2024). Interaction between station rotation model and cognitive style on student’s collaborative skills. Migration Letters, 21(4), 46–56. https://migrationletters.com/index.php/ml/article/view/7209
Belazi, N., & Ganapathy, M. (2021). The effects of the station rotation model in promoting Libyan students’ EFL writing: Blended learning. AJELP: Asian Journal of English Language and Pedagogy, 9(1), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.37134/ajelp.vol9.1.10.2021
Belazi, N. A., & Ganapathy, M. (2023). Teachers’ and students’ perceptions towards the station rotation model: A case of Libyan EFL writing classroom. AJELP: Asian Journal of English Language and Pedagogy, 11(1), 22–36. https://doi.org/10.37134/ajelp.vol11.1.2.2023
Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems. In The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 3–21). Pfeiffer.
Horn, M. B., & Staker, H. (2015). Blended: Using disruptive innovation to improve schools. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Ioannou, M., Ioannou, A., Georgiou, Y., & Boloudakis, M. (2020). Orchestrating the technology-enhanced embodied learning classroom via learning stations rotation: A case study. In Workshop on Hybrid Learning Spaces-Data, Design, Didactics.
Jingtao, L. (2023). Impact of the station rotation model of blended learning on EFL college students’ listening skills. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(12), 2034–3049. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v13-i12/19490
Latif, N. H. A., Shahrill, M., & Hidayat, W. (2024). Mastering fractions and innovating with the station rotation model in blended learning. Infinity Journal, 13(2), 501–530. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v13i2.p501-530
Levy, M. (2002). CALL by design: Discourse, products and processes. ReCALL, 14(1), 58–84. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344002000617
Lim, S. (2015). A blended learning case study: The application of station rotation model in ELT listening and speaking class at Phayao Pittayakhom School. In International Conference on Language, Literature, Culture and Education (pp. 129–141).
Mamman, B., Abuhassna, H., Umara, K., Mustapha, A. M., Awae, F., Ali, A. S., ... & Almheiri, A. S. B. H. (2022). Pre-service teachers’ views on how the station rotation model with a blended social learning environment (SRM-BSCLE) enhances their critical thinking skills. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 11(2), 1298–1334. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v11-i2/14134
Mcdonald, J. (2006). Blended learning and online tutoring: A good practice guide. Hampshire, England: Gower Publishing.
Nagy, N. M. A. H. (2018). The effect of using the station rotation model on preparatory students' writing performance. Online Submission.
Othman, S. Z., Zaid, N. M., Harun, J., & Abdullah, Z. (2018, December). Developing higher-order thinking skill with the 120-minute instructional station rotation (MRSP120) approach: Students' perceptions. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering (TALE) (pp. 1039–1043). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/TALE.2018.8615170
Pimpiban, S. (2016). Effects of using station rotation model in blended learning on English speaking ability of Thai EFL primary school students [Master’s thesis, Chulalongkorn University]. Chulalongkorn University Theses and Dissertations (Chula ETD). https://doi.org/10.58837/CHULA.THE.2016.1885
Rodríguez, J. M., & Rojo, A. (2020). On blended learning flexibility: An educational approach. In A. Martín-García (Ed.), Blended Learning: Convergence between Technology and Pedagogy (pp. 21–44). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45781-5_2
Sharma, P., & Barrett, B. (2008). Blended learning: Using technology in and beyond the language classroom. Macmillan Education.
Tomlinson, B., & Whittaker, C. (2013). Blended learning in English language teaching. London: British Council.
Truitt, A. A., & Ku, H. Y. (2018). A case study of third-grade students’ perceptions of the station rotation blended learning model in the United States. Educational Media International, 55(2), 153–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2018.1484042
Uludag, A. K. (2023). The combination of flipped learning, station technique, and technology in harmony lesson: Evaluating students’ achievement, attitude, and views. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 35, 159–186. https://doi.org/10.14689/enad.35.1695
Xiangze, Z., & Abdullah, Z. (2023). Station rotation with gamification approach to increase students’ engagement in learning English online. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on CALL, (9), 105–121. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/call9.7
Yukhymenko, V., Borysova, S., Bazyl, O., Hubal, H., & Barkar, U. (2024). Station rotation model of blended learning in higher education: Achieving a balance between online and in-person instruction. Conhecimento & Diversidade, 16(41), 182–202. https://doi.org/10.18316/rcd.v16i41.11434
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.